Category Archives: Uncategorized

How to strangle productivity

Step 1 Outlook Web App.  Step 2 Time Tracking software.

I’m not quite sure why companies adopt time tracking software.  A friend mentioned that he thought there was some accounting treatment that encouraged it but some web searching has only lead me to BS statements like these.

“Time is money, so once it is clear where employees are spending their time, an employer can decide how to better prepare and deal with projects.”

“With a distributed company it ensures that everyone is working.”

Yes, entering eights into boxes ensures that I’m working.  Apparently if the time tracking interface is as cumbersome as possible someone can be extra sure that I’m hard at work.

Now, HR people tend to be extremely nice and well-meaning, perhaps this makes them especially susceptible to the sales pitch of time tracking companies. I understand if a company has part-time employees, or is billing hours to clients; then tracking those hours can make sense. For salaried employees who are otherwise being treated as adults, it’s a gigantic waste of time. Particularly if the software requires a training meeting.

Which leads to TODAY’S CHALLENGE.


Decision Making

How a team makes decisions determines how effective that team is.

All teams have a decision making process whether explicit or implicit and all members of the team have a hand in it. Even in a purely a command and control structure, such as a fast food restaurant where process is centrally decided, every member of the team at the restaurant is reinterpreting the decision and evolving it into what actually happens.

Modern organizations do knowledge work where decisions are the primary output: whether to have a sale or run an ad campaign; which feature to build next. Therefore teams need to be highly concerned with the effectiveness of those decisions. This may take a large amount of time and certainly takes effort and focus. Since every member of the team will evolve what they are working on toward what that member wants, a big portion of the decision making process may be mostly invisible.  This hidden misalignment is a big part of why outputs differ from what was decided in the ‘the meeting’ on what those outputs will be.

That’s not to say that everyone at a company needs to be involved in every decision. However, visibility about what decisions are going to be made and when, can allow people to self select to be involved in the decisions that most affect their work. Make it clear that anyone can attend any meeting and that it is everyone’s responsibility to exclude themselves from meetings as well.

Meetings are frequently inefficiently run.  Which is a big problem.  So solve it.  Make meetings short and focused.  If you have set up the meeting, you may need to exclude yourself from arguing a side of the decision to be made in order to keep the meeting on task.  If that is the case, you can appoint a surrogate to help convey your point of view, or appoint a surrogate to run the meeting.  Is there more to discuss?  Have another short meeting tomorrow where whoever still needs to be heard should attend and everyone will have had time to consider and refine their ideas.  Communication needs to happen and it is best if it is explicit and visible to anyone who wants to know.

Another symptoms of bad meetings is when communication primarily happens in informal groups.  Part of this is natural, a huge amount of communication and productive thinking happens over beers or while chatting about something else.  That is good and worth encouraging.  What is bad is if the only forum for people to voice their concerns or for strategies to be realigned is when enough people happen to get together for lunch or drinks.

Want your team to make better decisions? Here are a few questions to ask yourself and your team members.

What decisions do you need to be involved in that you are not now? Which do you not need to be involved in?

Who should be making the tradeoff between X and Y (often the customer if possible), how do we convey the reasoning behind that tradeoff to everyone who is working on it?

Help me out, what other good questions should a team be asking in order to make effective decisions?

Upgrading to Dojo 1.7.2

Upgrading a project to dojo 1.7.2 from 1.6.0.  While I could simply point to the new version (it seems quite backward compatible), I think it’s time to switch to the new AMD compatible require / declare syntax.

Step 1.  Pointed at the CDN and set async to true:

<script type="text/<span class=">// <![CDATA[
// <![<span class="hiddenSpellError" pre="">CDATA</span>[
// ]]></script>
javascript" src="//"
// ]]></script>
 data-dojo-config="async: true, parseOnLoad:true">

Immediately the async: true caused dojo is undefined errors from dojo.byId and dojo.require statements.

// A slide out tab
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
        properties: {
            height: 0

The fix was pretty easy

Step 2. Change dojo.require to require and move dojo.addOnLoad into

require([“dojo”,”dojo/fx”, “dojo/domReady!”], function(fx){


Upgrading custom dojo build to 1.7.2

First build overwrote dojo.js, oops, which gave this unhelpful error,

js: uncaught JavaScript runtime exception: ReferenceError: "require" is not defined.

Note: I should have finished this post a year ago when I was doing the upgrade.  There were a few more issues I ran into but it’s a bit fuzzy now.

Gigabyte P55-USB3 motherboard with 2000 MHz RAM

Just plugged 8GB of G.Skill 2133 mhz ram into my desktop.  The memory clock speed stayed at 1333 mhz when I did so which led to some fiddling with bios settings.

I have a Gigabyte P55-USB3 motherboard with an i5 2.8 Ghz processor and plugged in 2 x 4GB modules of the F3-17000CL11D Ripjaws ram from G.Skill (in a nice red color to boot).  Motherboard manual is here,

Once in the bios config in the ‘MB Intelligent Tweaker’, the ‘Advanced Memory Settings’ seemed to have what I needed, ‘Extreme Memory Profiles’ for different speeds.   Profile 2 put the speed at 2130 mhz and all the advanced timing settings matched the memory specs (11-11-11-30 2N).  Unfortunately, it wouldn’t boot.  Switching between the different  profiles (disabled, profile 1, profile 2) and ‘Performance Enhance’ modes (standard, turbo, extreme) didn’t help much, the only way  I could boot was at 1600 Mhz in the disabled profile with extreme performance enhance.

Fortunately I hit on a nice overclocking guide,

Leaving the memory settings at the default values, I  went into the ‘Advanced Frequency Settings’ section and changed the Base Clock BCLK to 200Mz with  the CPU Clock Ratio at 16x.  This gave me an overclocked CPU speed of 3.2 Ghz (seemed reasonable and a nice bonus) and put the Memory Frequency at 2000 MHZ (good enough).

After a few hours of serious programming work, the system has been completely stable and seems a bit faster.  Hope that helps.

Running your Government

In the absence of InnoVoter / StickyVote, you may be wondering, “how can I best manage my Government?”  I’m happy to report that this area is still a hotbed of startup activity.  Although several contemporary projects have shut down, some have morphed and new ones have started.

One of the new,, raised $1.5 million just over a year ago and has quite the who’s who of advisers and investors.  Interestingly they have chosen to focus on voter registration records; one of the big early decisions I made was just to prototype that piece and to leave full implementation for later.  Before too long we should see whether that will form a strong foundation for Votizen to build on or a crushing weight of software and data maintenance.

Next on the list is, co-founded by the guy behind, which is still a great source of Federal legislative data.  To communicate with Congress this is the best tool I’ve seen, they have great widgets and do a good job of grouping similar bills together.  The one other I recommend is, a non-profit with a strong community of users commenting on bills as well as any easy place to find general information on Congress.

SOTU 2012

After putting the kid to bed I caught the latter part of the State of the Union.  Good combative speech, I generally liked it.  I would have enjoyed more humility in the mention of our partnerships with other countries, we’re not actually in charge of the world it turns out.  But I do enjoy a feisty speech.

And the Republican response?  I liked the theme, a loyal opposition is critical and Mitch Daniels started off well.  However, “As a loyal opposition, who put patriotism and national success ahead of party or ideology or any self-interest.”  Oh, is that what threatening default on the debt was, causing economic uncertainty for months, the national interest?  Sorry Mitch, had to laugh you off the stage at that point.